Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Reconstruction: Overview, Analysis, and Challenges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Medical imaging is essential in contemporary healthcare as it assists in the identification of diseases, development of treatment strategies, and ongoing monitoring of patients.Over the years, deep learning (DL)techniques have emerged as a transformative force in medical image reconstruction, enabling the generation of high-quality images from noisy, incomplete, or under-sampled data.This review paper provides a comprehensive survey of recent advancements and applications of deep learning methods in medical image reconstruction.The key challenges in medical image reconstruction include issues related to reconstruction accuracy, noise sensitivity, and data limitation.A variety of deep learning models and their combinations are suitable for medical image reconstruction due to their unique capabilities, such as spatial hierarchy capture, adversarial learning, and other features, which allow them to address the complexities and challenges associated with medical image reconstruction.The paper analyses the key contributions of DL-based approaches in different imaging modalities, including computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).DL techniques are enabling image reconstruction in specialized medical fields like neuroimaging and cardiac imaging, but practitioners face challenges in training complex models and understanding their results.Finally, future research directions are suggested to improve the key limitations highlighted in this survey study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".