MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395075562 · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-2262-4

Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

2024· book· en· W4395075562 on OpenAlexfundno aff
De-Nian Yang, Xing Xie, Vincent S. Tseng, Jian Pei, Jen-Wei Huang, Jerry Chun‐Wei Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes in computer science · 2024
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina University of GeosciencesNational Cheng Kung UniversityNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyUniversità di PisaUppsala UniversitetUniversidad de ZaragozaUniversity of DhakaUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignNational Taiwan UniversitySyddansk UniversitetHokkaido UniversityNational Tsing Hua UniversityShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityPontificia Universidade Católica do ParanáUniversità degli Studi di PaviaShanxi UniversityNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsUniversity of Massachusetts BostonEast China Normal UniversityChang Gung UniversityChinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaSouth Asian UniversityNanyang Technological UniversityMacquarie UniversityUniversity of PittsburghMassey UniversityIndian Institute of Technology DelhiChang Gung Medical FoundationNational Kaohsiung University of Science and TechnologyUniversité Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-MarneUniversity of MinnesotaPolitecnico di TorinoSwinburne University of TechnologyMcMaster UniversitySanta Clara UniversityNanjing UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonDeakin UniversityUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore CountyGeorgia State UniversityArizona State UniversityBudapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi EgyetemOhio State University
KeywordsComputer scienceKnowledge extractionData scienceData miningInformation retrieval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes in computer scienceSame topicData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207