MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395078660 · doi:10.18280/ria.380235

Enhancing 3D Animation Through AI: Leveraging Computer Vision and Neural Networks

2024· article· en· W4395078660 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yunpeng Tang, Bunchoo Bunlikhitsiri, Poradee Panthupakorn

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial neural networkAnimationArtificial intelligenceComputer graphics (images)Computer visionComputer animationHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As digital technologies rapidly evolve, 3D animation has become increasingly prevalent in fields such as multimedia, gaming, cinema, and advertising, establishing itself as a vital mode of visual communication.Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in computer vision and deep learning, have opened new avenues for the creation and dissemination of 3D animations.However, existing methods of 3D animation creation still face numerous challenges, particularly in handling 2D view feature points and producing high-quality 3D animations.This study addresses these limitations by proposing an optimized approach that integrates a back propagation (BP) neural network and a fully convolutional network (FCN), aimed at enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of processing 2D view feature points.Furthermore, a novel pyramid graph neural network (GNN) algorithm based on the Transformer model has been developed, designed to generate natural and high-quality 3D animations depicting agrarian scenes in the Jiangnan region.The application of these technologies not only holds promise for improving the efficiency and quality of 3D animation production but also plays a significant role in advancing the application of AI technologies in artistic creation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topic3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207