Multi-modal Pulmonary Imaging: Using Complementary Information from CT and Hyperpolarized <sup>129</sup>Xe MRI to Evaluate Lung Structure-Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyperpolarized 129Xe gas MRI is an emerging technique to evaluate and measure regional lung function including pulmonary gas distribution and gas exchange. Chest computed tomography (CT) still remains the clinical gold standard for imaging of the lungs, though, in part due to the rapid CT protocols that acquire high-resolution images in seconds and the widespread availability of CT scanners. Quantitative approaches have enabled the extraction of structural lung parenchymal, airway and vascular measurements from chest CT that have been evaluated in many clinical research studies. Together, CT and 129Xe MRI provide complementary information that can be used to evaluate regional lung structure and function, resulting in new insights into lung health and disease. 129Xe MR-CT image registration can be performed to measure regional lung structure-function to better understand lung disease pathophysiology, and to perform image-guided pulmonary interventions. Here, a method for 129Xe MRI-CT registration is outlined to support implementation in research or clinical settings. Registration methods and applications that have been employed to date in the literature are also summarized, and suggestions are provided for future directions that may further overcome technical challenges related to 129Xe MR-CT image registration and facilitate broader implementation of regional lung structure-function evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".