The Impact of Carbon Emission Pricing Policy on the Transformation of Low Carbon Economy and Its Application in the Energy Industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The theory of externalities, public goods, and economic incentives all consider carbon emissions as a negative externality that harms the environment and requires economic tools to internalize its costs. This forms the theoretical foundation and global standard for carbon emission pricing policies. This paper examines the impact of carbon emission pricing policies on the transition to a low-carbon economy, particularly focusing on their application in the energy sector. To begin, the paper introduces the theoretical foundations of carbon emission pricing policy. By introducing economic costs to carbon emitters, such as taxing them or creating a carbon emissions trading market, carbon pricing policies can incentivize them to reduce their emissions. This paper summarizes the international practical experience of carbon emission pricing policies. The European Union's carbon emissions trading system is the most extensive, and the reduction of carbon emissions has been achieved through trading. Canada, Australia, and other countries have also implemented similar policies and have observed specific outcomes. These practical experiences demonstrate that carbon emission pricing policy can effectively promote low-carbon economic transformations. This paper delves into the effects of carbon emission pricing policy on the energy sector, which is the primary source of carbon emissions. The effect of such a policy on the energy sector is particularly significant, as it can motivate energy companies to transition to low-carbon energy and foster a transformation of energy systems. Moreover, carbon pricing policies can incentivize energy businesses to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions. This paper summarizes the benefits and challenges of carbon pricing policy and offers ideas for its implementation in the energy sector. Carbon emission pricing policies can provide long-term stability to the energy sector, while also encouraging research, development, and adoption of low-carbon technologies. Nevertheless, the implementation of carbon emission pricing policy is confronted with political, economic, and technological obstacles, necessitating the joint efforts of the government, businesses, and society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".