Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Communication-based planning involves understanding communication patterns and interaction methods within a targeted development area. Kampung Adat Kuta, a traditional village, maintains extensive communication ties with governmental institutions, educational bodies, and various entities. To assess the extent of their connections with external parties, a communication network mapping is essential. Analyzing social networks through Centrality measurements provides insights into key actors within Kampung Adat Kuta, those with close relationships both internally and externally, and individuals capable of facilitating internal and external communication relationships within the village network. This research involves questioning influential figures in Kampung Adat Kuta about their communication relationships. As a novel investigation, the study aims to generate a communication network that contributes significantly to the forthcoming planning efforts in Kampung Adat Kuta. Abstrak. Perencanaan yang berbasis komunikasi dilakukan salah satunya dengan cara mengetahui bagaimana pola komunikasi dan cara berinteraksi pada Kawasan yang ingin dikembangkan. Kampung adat kuta memiliki hubungan komunikasi yang cukup luas mulai dari instansi pemerintahan, instansi Pendidikan, dan sebagainnya. sehingga pemetaan jejaring komunikasi dibutuhkan untuk melihat sejauh mana mereka menjaring hubungan dengan pihak luar, untuk melihat pola dan sebaran komunikasi maka diperlukan analisis jejaring sosial dengan menggunakan pengukuran Centrality, yang dapat melihat siapa yang menjadi pemeran kunci di Kampung Adat Kuta, siapa saja yang memiliki hubungan dekat dengan pihak eksternal dan internal, dan juga melihat siapa yang memiliki kapasitas untuk memfasilitasi hubungan komunikasi internal dan eksternal yang ada pada jaringan komunikasi Kampung Adat Kuta. Penelitian ini di lakukan dengan menanyakan pertanyaan seputar hubungan komunikasi kepada pihak yang dianggap berpengaruh di Kampung Adat Kuta. Penelitian ini belum pernah dilakukan Sehingga penelitian ini bisa menghasilkan jejaring komunikasi yang diharapkan bisa berkontribusi terhadap perencanaan yang akan dilakukan di Kampung Adat Kuta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".