Physiological Mechanisms of Photosynthesis and Antioxidant System in Rice under High Temperature Stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rice (Oryza sativa), as one of the major global food crops, faces threats to its growth and yield due to climate change, particularly high-temperature stress. This study aims to delve into the physiological mechanisms of rice photosynthesis and antioxidant systems under high-temperature stress conditions. The objective is to analyze how rice responds to high-temperature pressure and understand its adaptive mechanisms. By synthesizing and analyzing data related to rice photosynthesis and antioxidant systems under high-temperature stress, the study summarizes the physiological responses of rice to high temperature, including the adverse impacts on growth and yield, as well as changes in relevant physiological parameters. Furthermore, the study discusses the regulation of photosynthesis and the mechanisms of the antioxidant system under high-temperature conditions, with particular emphasis on the variations in antioxidant enzyme activities and the importance of antioxidant substances in protecting plants from oxidative damage. The significance of this research lies in enhancing our understanding of the adaptability of rice to climate change, providing crucial insights for improving rice resistance to high-temperature stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".