MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395101165 · doi:10.25145/j.cuidar.2023.03.11

Absentismo laboral. Una mirada a los accidentes de trabajo en España durante el periodo 2014-2022

2023· article· en· W4395101165 on OpenAlexaff
Sara Lázaro Leal, Carmen Arroyo López, María de los Ángeles Leal Felipe, Alfonso Miguel García Hernández

Bibliographic record

VenueCuidar Revista de Enfermería de la Universidad de La Laguna · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicStress and Burnout Research
Canadian institutionsWorkplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbsenteeismSick leaveDemographyFalling (accident)Occupational safety and healthHealth professionalsRest (music)MedicineGerontologyEnvironmental healthPsychologyHealth carePolitical sciencePhysical therapySociologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To know the evolution of the occupational accident rate in our country in the period 2014- 2022, and its impact on absenteeism due to temporary incapacity (TI). Conclusions: The impact of the covid-19 pandemic on the results of total absenteeism due to occupational accidents with sick leave is significant. This increase is mainly due to the increase in work accidents with sick leave in the group of Health Activities and in the group of Health Professionals, since accidents in itinere do not show significant increases in the years of pandemic compared to previous years. The number of sick days in health activities and in the group of health professionals increased significantly in the pandemic period. The group of professionals in the rest of the economic activities behaves differently in sick leave days than the rest of the groups with increases and decreases throughout the years. (Remember that we were in a period of confinement in a state of alarm: between March 14 and June 21, 2020).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuidar Revista de Enfermería de la Universidad de La LagunaSame topicStress and Burnout ResearchFrench-language works237,207