ACORDO FEITO, PROMESSA CUMPRIDA? COMPLIANCE E RECEPÇÃO DE REFUGIADOS VENEZUELANOS NO BRASIL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo examina como as normas internacionais de direitos humanos explicam a compliance para a recepção de refugiados venezuelanos no Brasil. Nos últimos anos, este país recebeu um número expressivo de nacionais da Venezuela, cuja crise política provocou um deslocamento em massa. Leis, resoluções e políticas públicas criadas para o acolhimento e para integração dos refugiados no Brasil abrangem as variáveis que elucidam a prática das diretrizes recomendadas por tratados internacionais ratificados pelo país, como a Declaração Universal de Direitos Humanos, Convenção de Genebra de 1951 e o Protocolo de 1967. A pesquisa desenvolve um estudo de caso qualitativo com a técnica do process tracing para observar a compliance e identificar os mecanismos causais que precederam o cumprimento. Os resultados confirmam a hipótese de que tanto as normas internacionais de direitos humanos, quanto as políticas públicas explicam o cumprimento das normas no caso do Brasil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".