Selection of Optimum Ternary Binder Systems that Enhance the Workability and Durability of Concrete used in Marine Railways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the improvement of the compressive strength and duradbility of concrete used in marine railways by adding binding agents was investigated. The test speciments used in the study comprised developed product A (DP_A), developed product B (DP_B), Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), admixture A, and admixture B, in the study, the optimum ternary binder systems of the test specimens were identified. An optimum ternary binder system would facilitate the simultaneous enhancement of the durability and workability of concrete used on undersea tunnel linings and bridge structures. The compressive strength of each specimen tested after 16h could easily meet the specified standard target strength (> 3.0_MPa). Moreover, the 7d long term strength of each test specimen exceeded 3.0 MPa. When binders were used, the chloride penetration resistance (DP_A was exceptional)_2.741C (normal) and, 1.490C (low) following-28 and 91days. The surface diffustion coefficient of (DP_B) at 91days 9.12 (× 10-12, m<sup>2</sup>/sec) was higher than that of OPC 9.55 (× 10-12, m<sup>2</sup>/sec). However, the surface diffusion coefficient of (DP_A) was 4.15 (× 10-12, m<sup>2</sup>/sec) which was lower than OPC by approximately 57%, indicating the outstanding durability of DP_A.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".