Behavior of Acoustic Emission Waves in Rubberized Concretes under Flexure in a Subfreezing Environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper attempts to evaluate the change in the behavior of the acoustic waves associated with flexure cracks developed in rubberized concretes in a subfreezing environment. Seven normal and rubberized concrete mixtures were developed with different compositions. Prism samples from each mixture were tested at two temperatures (25°C and −20°C) under a four-point monotonic flexure test while being monitored via two attached acoustic emission (AE) sensors to collect the emitted AEs till failure. The AE signal characteristics such as signal amplitudes, number of hits, and cumulative signal strength (CSS) were collected and used for three AE parameter-based analyses: b-value, intensity, and rise time–amplitude (RA) analysis. Analyzing the acoustic activity revealed micro- and macrocracks nucleation, which were found to be associated with a noticeable spike in CSS, historic index [H(t)], severity (Sr) values, and a significant dip in the b-values. In addition, cold temperature was found to increase the micro- and macrocracking onset load and time regardless of mixture composition. Besides, mixtures with a lower C/F, less crumb rubber (CR) content, and/or smaller rubber particle size witnessed higher micro- and macrocrack load and time thresholds. Noticeably, the AE signal attenuation effect caused by the high CR content (up to 30%) at 25°C was significantly relieved when samples were tested at −20°C. Three charts were developed to classify the cracking level based on the values of the intensity analysis parameters [H(t) and S] and RA analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it