Tri-Band Frequency Reconfigurable Antenna for Wireless Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reconfigurable antennas are pivotal in advancing the versatility of modern wireless communication devices, allowing operation across diverse frequency bands, polarizations, and radiation patterns.This study introduces a tri-band frequency reconfigurable planar monopole antenna that leverages a shortened metal ground plane and a 1.6 mm thick FR-4 substrate to enhance its adaptability in multi-band wireless applications.Our innovative design utilizes optical switching to transition between dual-band and single-band operational modes: Enabling Wi-Fi at 2.4 GHz and WLAN at 5.65 GHz in the dual-band mode, and WiMAX at 3.5 GHz in the single-band mode when the optical switch is toggled off.The antenna's configuration not only fulfills the demanding multi-frequency requirements of contemporary portable devices like laptops, PDAs, and smartphones but also caters to specific applications in safety and rescue operations due to its compact, lowprofile, and lightweight design.Performance evaluations demonstrate robust functionality with optimal frequency reconfigurability, highlighted by a VSWR below 2 across all operational bands, making it a prime candidate for future scalable wireless systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it