MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395109657 · doi:10.18280/ria.380233

An Efficient Machine Learning Based Attendance Monitoring System Through Face Recognition

2024· article· en· W4395109657 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Upendra Chowdary Kurra, Balaji Tata, Jammalamadugu Ravindranath, Venu Madhav Panchagnula, Dasari Rasmitha

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacial recognition systemAttendanceComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningFace (sociological concept)Pattern recognition (psychology)Political scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the modern technological era, face recognition is attracting greater attention.The two methods used to recognize a person are physiological and behavioral, including fingerprint, iris scan, voice scan, signature scan, palm scan, etc.For this type of recognition, human action must be involved like placing the finger on a scanner.While face recognition does not need any human action, so it is most successful than any other biometric identification method and also advantageous.It is not new technology for us; we have been using it in our daily lives.It plays an important role in retail crimes, unlocking phones, finding the missing persons, helping blind, facilitating secure transactions, validating identity at ATMs, diagnose disease, protecting law enforcement, student attendance system, etc.The face recognition system can be realized using the existing hardware, cameras and image capture devices.Identifying a face from an existing database is a challenging issue in face recognition.Poor image quality, inadequate illumination, the subject not looking directly at the camera, and other factors can all cause problems.The same person's face will look different depending on how they are feeling.As a person ages, it gets harder to identify their face since their size and color may also change.This article uses the suggested system's Android application to track attendance using face recognition.The proposed technique can be utilized to school and college participation records.The human face in the transferred to the server picture of that class can be perceived utilizing a calculation.The HAAR overflow classifier is being utilized to cut out the face in this case and distinguish it.The HOG approach is then used to extricate the highlights of the perceived face.In the closing stage, a SVM classifier is utilized to distinguish the person from our data set.At the point when the individual is recognized in the photograph, the participation for that specific class will be naturally appointed in the succeed sheet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207