MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395111826 · doi:10.18280/ria.380215

Decoded-ViT: A Vision Transformer Framework for Handwritten Digit String Recognition

2024· article· en· W4395111826 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vanita Agrawal, Jayant Jagtap, MVV Prasad Kantipudi

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNumerical digitTransformerDigit recognitionComputer scienceSpeech recognitionString (physics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceArithmeticEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageMathematicsArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the era of digitization, handwritten document recognition has several applications, like historical information preservation, postal address recognition, etc.The conservation and analysis of priceless cultural treasures depend heavily on the handwritten digit string recognition from historical documents.The prominent challenges in recognition are writing style variations, noise, distortions, and limited data.This paper suggests a novel method for overcoming the difficulties in reading complex, fading, and old handwritten documents that contain digit strings.The goal is to create a reliable and effective system that automatically recognizes digit strings from ancient manuscripts, helping to digitize records.Hence, this paper proposes a robust vision transformer framework to identify handwritten digit strings without segmentation of digits from uncleaned images of smaller datasets.The proposed method is a four-step procedure comprised of preprocessing, feature extraction through tokenization, recognition using the attention mechanism of a vision transformer, and outcome decoding using a beam search decoder.The performance of the proposed method is compared with the hybrid approach consisting of a Convolutional Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM).The proposed method achieved word accuracy of 56% with a loss below 0.6 in less time.The results show that the proposed model is a fast learner and can be used in real-time scenarios where results are expected in less time.The proposed deep learning model performance explanation is also discussed in this paper with the help of the Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) technique.The results of this study impact the digitization of postal services.The generalization of the proposed method by providing Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) for real-time applications is explored as a future research direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicHandwritten Text Recognition TechniquesFrench-language works237,207