MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395112450 · doi:10.18280/ria.380201

Design of an AI Layer for Real-Time Skin Cancer Diagnosis

2024· article· fr· W4395112450 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rashmi Ashtagi, Ketan Kotecha, Adithya Padthe, Sandip Shinde, Sheela Chinchmalatpure, Deepak Mane

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLayer (electronics)CancerComputer scienceSkin cancerMedicineMaterials scienceInternal medicineNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skin cancer is a common and potentially fatal disease that necessitates early and precise diagnosis for effective treatment.In recent years, artificial intelligence has shown promise in aiding dermatologists in the diagnosis of skin cancer.However, the inability of AI models to be interpreted hinders their adoption in clinical practice.This paper presents the design of an AI-based architecture for the real-time diagnosis of skin cancer in an effort to address such issues.The proposed system employs a collection of artificial intelligence (AI) models, including Decision Trees, Rule-Based Models, Logistic Regression, and Deep Forest Models, to achieve accurate and interpretable skin cancer diagnosis.Each model contributes its strengths to the ensemble, thereby enhancing the performance and interpretability of the whole.The ensemble method combines the benefits of various models to compensate for their shortcomings.The effectiveness of the proposed system is demonstrated by the analysis of a Skin Cancer MNIST, ISIC, and Mendeley Skin Cancer Datasets with nearly 250K samples, with 98.9% accuracy, 99.5% precision, and 98.5% recall.The system outperforms existing skin cancer diagnosis methods.The achieved accuracy and performance metrics indicate the system's potential as a reliable real-time diagnostic tool for dermatologists.The proposed system's use cases are diverse.Dermatologists can use the real-time skin cancer diagnosis system to accelerate the screening process, improve diagnostic accuracy, and improve patient outcomes in clinical settings.The models are selected for their ability to capture complex relationships in data, with each model contributing its individual strengths to the ensemble, thereby enhancing the performance and interpretability of the whole.In addition, the system can be integrated into telemedicine platforms, allowing remote patients to receive preliminary assessments and guidance from AI models prior to seeking additional medical care scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207