Supervised Machine Learning Entity Sentiment Analysis: Prediction of Support for 2024 Indonesian Presidential Candidates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
is a political year in Indonesia as it marks the presidential general election.The proliferation of survey institutions attempting to capture the electability levels of each candidate may not invariably yield accurate results, as evidenced by the events of the 2016 United States Presidential election.The loyal support creates tight competition and a narrow margin in electability levels among the three contending candidates.Opinion mining on social media offers an alternative that addresses the challenges often encountered when measuring electability using traditional survey methods.This study aims to build entitylevel sentiment classifiers as a new approach for predicting electability of presidential candidates based on citizen support on social media Twitter within the framework of the CRISP-DM model.The study compares 9 different algorithms with 3 vectorization techniques.Evaluation measurement with 4 metrics: accuracy, precision, recall and f1score is performed.As a result, TF-IDF 3-gram Random Forest achieves the highest fiscore 0.84486.The selected model is then employed to measure the presidential candidates' electability levels over time.Besides streamlining the process, social media's opinion mining enables the candidates and their constituents to monitor electability levels affordably in real-time and on-demand manner, which is advantageous compared to traditional surveys.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it