MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395112809 · doi:10.18280/ria.380225

Hybrid Approach for Effective Segmentation and Classification of Glaucoma Disease Using UNet++ and CapsNet

2024· article· en· W4395112809 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Govindharaj Iyyanar, Karthick Prasad Gunasekaran, Michael W. George

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceGlaucomaPattern recognition (psychology)MedicineOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glaucoma is an incapacitating eye disease that can result in total vision loss if left untreated, making early treatment through screening more likely to prevent irreversible visual impairment and delay.Unfortunately, however, due to complex testing procedures and healthcare professional shortages often resulting in delays-contributing to an increasing global incidence of blindness.Also, with an estimated 76 million people affected by glaucoma worldwide, recent statistics highlight the need of addressing this prevalent condition.To combat these challenges and enhance manual methods further it is urgently required that a reliable framework be created for early detection of lesions on Optic Cup and Optic Disc with characteristics overlapping with variations in eye colour making accurate diagnosis even more challenging.At present, we present an automated system for the detection of Glaucoma.The model we present begins by pre-processing retinal images using advanced techniques like histogram equalization and Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), designed to improve image quality and analysis.Next U-Shape Network technique (UNet++) used for discs and cups segmentation separately; this segmentation technique offers accurate identification.Segmented optic disc and optic cup images are then utilized in our glaucoma diagnosis stage.We employ Capsule Network, a deep learning technique renowned for recognizing complex patterns, to detect glaucoma and it handles of complicated spatial relationships in an effective manner, solving such restrictions that are present in CNN.Comprehensive performance evaluation metrics were devised and 5-fold Cross validation was performed to verify our method, which demonstrated its superiority over existing methods with an overall accuracy rate of 97.89%.This high rate of precision highlights how automated framework can detect early signs of glaucoma for early intervention as well as reduce risks such as irreversible loss of vision for patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207