An Enhanced Hybrid Model for Liver Disease Detection Utilizing Deep Learning and Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The liver is our largest internal organ and controls all bodily metabolic processes, including transforming dietary nutrients into compounds that may be used by the body, storing those substances, and then providing them to the cells as needed.Ailments of the liver are among the most devastating disorders in many countries.The prevalence of liver disease has progressively risen due to excessive alcoholism, exposure to dangerous gases, eating foods laced with poison, and drug use.The majority of people worldwide experience mild to severe liver disorders as a result of bad lifestyle choices.Liver diseases continue to post a significant global health challenge, and the need for improved detection methods is crucial.Here, we propose a hybrid model to predict liver maladies utilizing machine learning & deep learning modes.Researchers study datasets of patients with liver disorders in order to help in the creation of classification models for forecasting liver illness.Making use of such datasets can ease the burden on medical practitioners and speed up the diagnosing process.An ensemble stacking model is used in the first phase with ML algorithms such as Na ve Bayes, Decision Tree, KNN & SVM.A logistic regression model functions as meta learner for predicting liver diseases utilizing clinical data.In the second phase, ensemble stacking model is used with VGG 16, ResNet and Inception V3 as the base learners and logistic regression as meta learner for the analysis of image dataset.Combining multiple models, especially using ensemble methods, often enhances predictive performance by leveraging the strengths of individual models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".