Bibliographic record
Abstract
A dataset containing 815 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "and" : [ "BasisOfRecord is Specimen", "Country is Colombia", { "or" : [ "DatasetKey is Canadian Museum of Nature Insect Collection", "DatasetKey is Colección de Entomología del Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH-E)", "DatasetKey is Coleópteros de los bosques montanos del Oriente Antioqueño, Cañón del río Melcocho, en el municipio de El Carmen de Viboral, Antioquia - Proyecto Colombia BIO", "DatasetKey is Colección entomológica del Museo de Historia Natural “Luis Gonzalo Andrade” de la UPTC", "DatasetKey is Insectos en el municipio de Medina, Cundinamarca - Proyecto Colombia Bio", "DatasetKey is Escarabajos coprófagos (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) del eje cafetero Colombiano", "DatasetKey is Coleópteros de sistemas cársticos en el municipio de El Peñón, Santander - Proyecto Colombia BIO", "DatasetKey is Estudios bióticos (Plantas, Fauna Edáfica, Anfibios y Aves) en los Complejos de páramos Tota-Bijagual-Mamapacha" ] }, "HasCoordinate is true", "TaxonKey is Cryptocanthon Balthasar, 1942", "HasGeospatialIssue is false" ] } The dataset includes 815 records from 6 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0006384-190415153152247/datasets/export for details. Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.387 | 0.506 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".