MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395211811 · doi:10.15468/dl.300oxr

Occurrence Download

2018· dataset· en· W4395211811 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility · 2018
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDownloadComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dataset containing 2831 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "and" : [ "BasisOfRecord is Specimen", { "or" : [ "Country is Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)", "Country is Peru", "Country is Paraguay", "Country is Guyana", "Country is Ecuador", "Country is Trinidad and Tobago", "Country is Brazil", "Country is Bolivia (Plurinational State of)", "Country is Mexico", "Country is Argentina" ] }, { "or" : [ "DatasetKey is NMNH Extant Specimen Records (USNM, US)", "DatasetKey is TTU Mammals Collection", "DatasetKey is Mammalogy Collection - Royal Ontario Museum", "DatasetKey is Field Museum of Natural History (Zoology) Mammal Collection", "DatasetKey is MVZ Mammal Collection (Arctos)" ] }, "HasCoordinate is true", { "or" : [ "InstitutionCode is mvz", "InstitutionCode is rom", "InstitutionCode is fmnh", "InstitutionCode is ttu", "InstitutionCode is usnm" ] }, "TaxonKey is Sturnira lilium (E.Geoffroy, 1810)", "HasGeospatialIssue is false" ] } The dataset includes 2831 records from 5 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0002282-180412121330197/datasets/export for details. Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2850.392

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Biodiversity Information FacilitySame topicSatellite Image Processing and PhotogrammetryFrench-language works237,207