Bibliographic record
Abstract
A dataset containing 3402 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "and" : [ "Country is Canada", "DatasetKey is iNaturalist Research-grade Observations", "Geometry POLYGON((-120.943 48.995,-118.397 48.995,-118.397 51.292,-120.943 51.292,-120.943 48.995))", "HasCoordinate is true", "HasGeospatialIssue is false", "TaxonKey is one of (Ambystoma mavortium Baird, 1850, Spea intermontana (Cope, 1883), Aechmophorus occidentalis (Lawrence, 1858), Falco peregrinus Tunstall, 1771, Tympanuchus phasianellus (Linnaeus, 1758), Psiloscops flammeolus (Kaup, 1852), Megascops kennicottii (D.G.Elliot, 1867), Melanerpes lewis (G.R.Gray, 1849), Leuconotopicus albolarvatus (Cassin, 1850), Oreoscoptes montanus (J.K.Townsend, 1837), Icteria virens (Linnaeus, 1758), Spizella breweri Cassin, 1856, Chondestes grammacus (Say, 1822), Ammodramus savannarum (J.F.Gmelin, 1789), Dolichonyx oryzivorus (Linnaeus, 1758), Myotis septentrionalis (Trouessart, 1897), Euderma maculatum (J.A.Allen, 1891), Antrozous pallidus (LeConte, 1856), Sylvilagus nuttallii (Bachman, 1837), Perognathus parvus (Peale, 1848), Reithrodontomys megalotis (Baird, 1857), Chrysemys picta (Schneider, 1783), Plestiodon skiltonianus Baird & Girard, 1852, Coluber constrictor Linnaeus, 1758, Hypsiglena chlorophaea Cope, 1860, Pituophis catenifer (Blainville, 1835), Crotalus oreganus Holbrook, 1840, Cicindela parowana Wickham, 1905, Efferia okanagana Cannings, 2012, Bombus occidentalis Greene, 1858, Polites mystic sonora (Scudder, 1872), Satyrium behrii (W.H.Edwards, 1870), Callophrys affinis (Edwards, 1862), Apodemia mormo Felder, 1859, Hemileuca nutalli Strecker, 1875, Argia vivida Hagen, 1865, Bryoerythrophyllum columbianum (F.J.Herm. & E.Lawton) R.H.Zander, Entosthodon rubiginosus (R.S.Williams) Grout, Pterygoneurum kozlovii Laz., Erigeron poliospermus A.Gray, Symphyotrichum frondosum (Nutt.) G.L.Nesom, Zeltnera exaltata (Griseb.) G.Mans., Ammannia robusta Heer ex Regel, Rotala ramosior (L.) Koehne, Oenothera pallida Lindl., Castilleja minor (A.Gray) A.Gray, Eleocharis geniculata (L.) Roem. & Schult., Cyperus subsquarrosus (Muhl.) Bauters, Sporobolus airoides (Torr.) Torr., Anaxyrus boreas (Baird & Girard, 1852), Podiceps auritus (Linnaeus, 1758), Ardea herodias Linnaeus, 1758, Buteo regalis (G.R.Gray, 1844), Numenius americanus Bechstein, 1812, Phalaropus lobatus (Linnaeus, 1758), Patagioenas fasciata (Say, 1822), Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769), Athene cunicularia (Molina, 1782), Asio flammeus (Pontoppidan, 1763), Chordeiles minor (J.R.Forster, 1771), Cypseloides niger (J.F.Gmelin, 1789), Sphyrapicus thyroideus (Cassin, 1852), Contopus cooperi (Nuttall, 1831), Riparia riparia (Linnaeus, 1758), Hirundo rustica Linnaeus, 1758, Euphagus carolinus (Statius Muller, 1776), Hesperiphona vespertina (W.Cooper, 1825), Myotis lucifugus (Le Conte, 1831), Aplodontia rufa (Rafinesque, 1817), Ursus arctos Linnaeus, 1758, Taxidea taxus (Schreber, 1777), Charina bottae (Blainville, 1835), Cicindela pugetana Casey, 1914, Cicindela decemnotata Say, 1817, Coccinella novemnotata Herbst, 1793, Coccinella transversoguttata Faldermann, 1835, Polites sabuleti (Boisduval, 1852), Euphyes vestris (Boisduval, 1852), Satyrium semiluna Klots, 1930, Speyeria mormonia (Boisduval, 1869), Danaus plexippus (Linnaeus, 1758), Stylurus olivaceus (Selys, 1873), Gonidea angulata (I.Lea, 1838), Microbryum vlassovii (Laz.) R.H.Zander, Antennaria flagellaris A.Gray, Psilocarphus brevissimus Nutt., Oreocarya glomerata (Pursh) Greene, Sandbergia whitedii (Piper) Greene, Phacelia ramosissima Douglas ex Lehm., Neoholmgrenia andina (Nutt.) W.L.Wagner & Hoch, Collomia tenella A.Gray, Phlox speciosa Pursh, Lindernia dubia Linnaeus, 1771, Orthocarpus barbatus J.S.Cotton, Bolboschoenus fluviatilis (Torr.) Soják, Schoenoplectiella saximontana (Fernald) Lye, Calochortus lyallii Baker, Spiranthes diluvialis Sheviak, Stipa thurberiana Piper, Azolla mexicana Schlecht. & Cham., 1830)", "Year 2000-2022" ] } The dataset includes 3402 records from 1 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0178282-220831081235567/datasets/export for details. Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.284 | 0.421 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".