MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4395377646 · doi:10.15468/3wgxrj

Canadian Museum of Nature - National Biodiversity Cryobank of Canada

2023· dataset· en· W4395377646 on OpenAlexaffabout
Roger D. Bull, Scott Fleischmann, Anna Ginter

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiodiversityGeographyEnvironmental resource managementEcologyEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The National Biodiversity Cryobank of Canada (NBCC) provides curated storage of genomic resources (e.g., tissue, DNA, environmental samples) generated by the Canadian Museum of Nature's research and donated by biodiversity researchers from Canada and abroad across all kingdoms of taxonomic classification. The facility currently has the capacity for 200,000 specimens and is expected to grow to a million specimens with the installation of additional liquid-nitrogen freezers.The NBCC was made possible thanks to the generosity of the Ross Beaty Family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.025
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0900.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies→French-language works237,207→