MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4395444906 · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ad4396

Residual NMP and Its Impacts on Performance of Lithium-Ion Cells

2024· article· en· W4395444906 on OpenAlexafffund
Meng Yue, Saad Azam, Ning Zhang, J. R. Dahn, Chongyin Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsResidualLithium (medication)IonMaterials scienceChemistryComputer scienceAlgorithmOrganic chemistryInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) is the most common solvent used in coating positive electrode materials on aluminum foil during the manufacturing of lithium-ion batteries. NMP is a strongly polar aprotic solvent that effectively dissolves the polyvinylidene difluoride binder. While the majority of NMP typically evaporates during the electrode baking process, trace amounts may persist, particularly in positive electrodes containing nano-sized and highly-porous active materials. We noted residual NMP in the positive electrodes of Li-ion pouch cells containing LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 due to the extremely high surface area of the material and we wanted to determine the impact of this residual NMP. Therefore, a control electrolyte was purposely spiked with varying amounts of NMP and used in NMC532/graphite pouch cells to investigate the impact of residual NMP on lithium-ion battery performance. Experimental results indicate that NMP has the potential not only to neutralize the electrolyte additive ethylene sulfate but also to independently increase cathode impedance, leading to a higher rate of capacity loss during charge-discharge cycling. It is crucial to establish the appropriate procedure for baking electrodes containing NMP, both in laboratory and industrial settings, to mitigate these effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical Society→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→