MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395445912 · doi:10.1016/j.npg.2024.04.002

Conduites suicidaires de la personne âgée : état des connaissances

2024· article· fr· W4395445912 on OpenAlex
Stéphane Richard‐Devantoy, Fabrice Jollant

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNPG. Neurologie, psychiatrie, gériatrie/NPG · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des LaurentidesDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En France, près de 8500 personnes décèdent de suicide chaque année dont plus de 30 % ont plus de 65 ans alors que cette classe d’âge représente environ 20 % de la population générale. Les taux de suicide sont les plus élevés parmi les hommes de 75 ans et plus, atteignant 49,5 pour 100 000 habitants, bien supérieur au taux moyen qui est de 13,4. Les tentatives de suicide sont moins fréquentes que pour les populations plus jeunes, en partie en raison d’une plus forte létalité des gestes suicidaires. Entre 3 et 5 % des personnes de plus de 65 ans ont exprimé des idées suicidaires au cours de la dernière année. Outre l’âge et le sexe, les principaux facteurs de risque suicidaires sont la maladie mentale, notamment la dépression, les troubles anxieux et les addictions ; les troubles neurocognitifs en début d’évolution ; la maladie physique douloureuse et invalidante, ou au pronostic vital engagé ; l’isolement social ; des événements de vie récents difficiles notamment les conflits interpersonnels, les difficultés financières, le veuvage chez les hommes, les changements de domicile, les maltraitances familiales et institutionnelles. La crise suicidaire est un état fluctuant et temporaire, de durée variable et sémiologiquement polymorphe. La douleur psychique est au cœur de la crise suicidaire ; le désespoir, les ruminations et les troubles du sommeil sont des éléments fréquents de ce tableau clinique. Nous décrivons ici brièvement plusieurs modèles cliniques, psychologiques et neurocognitifs du processus suicidaire. Au niveau individuel, la prévention du suicide repose sur l’identification des idées suicidaires de manière bienveillante et sans jugement, en reconnaissant la souffrance du sujet ; la mobilisation de l’entourage et des soignants, et la disponibilité ; la restriction d’accès à tout moyen létal ; le traitement actif de la maladie mentale, notamment de la dépression, des troubles anxieux et des addictions ; et la réduction de la douleur physique. La France a mis en place depuis 2018 une stratégie nationale de prévention du suicide dont une des conséquences positives générales pourrait être la déstigmatisation, la fin de nombreuses idées reçues délétères et la mobilisation de nombreux acteurs au niveau des territoires autour de cette question. Le suicide de la personne âgée n’est pas une fatalité. Toutefois, la législation attendue sur les soins de fin de vie pourrait venir heurter la prévention du suicide des personnes âgées. In France, almost 8500 people die by suicide every year, among whom over 30% are over 65, although this age group accounts for around 20% of the general population. Suicide rates are highest among men aged 75 and over, reaching 49.5 per 100,000 inhabitants, well above the average rate of 13.4. Suicide attempts among the elderly are less frequent than in younger populations, partly due to the greater lethality of the suicidal gestures in younger populations. Between 3 and 5% of people over 65 have expressed suicidal thoughts in the past year. In addition to age and gender, the main risk factors for suicide are mental illness, particularly depression, anxiety disorders and addictions; early-stage neurocognitive disorders; painful, incapacitating or life-threatening physical illness; social isolation; recent difficult life events, including interpersonal conflict, financial difficulties, widowhood among men, change of residence, and family and institutional maltreatment. The suicidal crisis is a fluctuating, temporary condition of variable duration and with a polymorphous semiology. Mental pain is central to the suicidal crisis; despair, ruminations and disturbed sleep are frequent features of this clinical syndrome. Here, we briefly describe several clinical, psychological, and neurocognitive models of the suicidal process. At individual level, suicide prevention is based on detecting suicidal ideation in a caring, non-judgmental way, acknowledging the subject's suffering, mobilizing the availability of the entourage and caregivers, restricting access to any lethal means, actively treating mental illness, particularly depression, anxiety disorders and addictions, and reducing physical pain. Since 2018, France has been implementing a national suicide prevention strategy. The possible positive consequences of this could include destigmatization, an end to many deleterious preconceived ideas and the mobilization of numerous actors in the field around this issue. Suicide among the elderly is preventable. However, the expected legislation on active end-of-life aid could come into conflict with the prevention of suicide among the elderly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it