MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395447900 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3393845

3DGTN: 3-D Dual-Attention GLocal Transformer Network for Point Cloud Classification and Segmentation

2024· article· en· W4395447900 on OpenAlex
Dening Lu, Kyle Gao, Qian Xie, Linlin Xu, Jonathan Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceSegmentationCloud computingGlocalizationArtificial intelligencePoint cloudDual (grammatical number)Computer visionRemote sensingGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the application of Transformers to 3-D point cloud processing has achieved significant progress and success, it is still challenging for existing 3-D Transformer methods to efficiently and accurately learn both valuable global and local features for improved applications. This article presents a novel point cloud representational learning network, called 3-D Dual Self-attention global local (GLocal) Transformer Network (3DGTN), for improved feature learning in both classification and segmentation tasks, with the following key contributions. First, a GLocal feature learning (GFL) block with the dual self-attention mechanism [i.e., a novel point-patch self-attention, called PPSA, and a channel-wise self-attention (CSA)] is designed to efficiently learn the global and local context information. Second, the GFL block is integrated with a multiscale Graph Convolution-based local feature aggregation (LFA) block, leading to a GLocal information extraction module that can efficiently capture critical information. Third, a series of GLocal modules are used to construct a new hierarchical encoder–decoder structure to enable the learning of information in different scales in a hierarchical manner. The proposed framework is evaluated on both classification and segmentation datasets, demonstrating that the proposed method is capable of outperforming many state-of-the-art methods on both synthetic and LiDAR data. Our code has been released at <uri xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://github.com/d62lu/3DGTN</uri>.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it