MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395447900 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3393845

3DGTN: 3-D Dual-Attention GLocal Transformer Network for Point Cloud Classification and Segmentation

2024· article· en· W4395447900 on OpenAlexafffund
Dening Lu, Kyle Gao, Qian Xie, Linlin Xu, Jonathan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceSegmentationCloud computingGlocalizationArtificial intelligencePoint cloudDual (grammatical number)Computer visionRemote sensingGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the application of Transformers to 3-D point cloud processing has achieved significant progress and success, it is still challenging for existing 3-D Transformer methods to efficiently and accurately learn both valuable global and local features for improved applications. This article presents a novel point cloud representational learning network, called 3-D Dual Self-attention global local (GLocal) Transformer Network (3DGTN), for improved feature learning in both classification and segmentation tasks, with the following key contributions. First, a GLocal feature learning (GFL) block with the dual self-attention mechanism [i.e., a novel point-patch self-attention, called PPSA, and a channel-wise self-attention (CSA)] is designed to efficiently learn the global and local context information. Second, the GFL block is integrated with a multiscale Graph Convolution-based local feature aggregation (LFA) block, leading to a GLocal information extraction module that can efficiently capture critical information. Third, a series of GLocal modules are used to construct a new hierarchical encoder–decoder structure to enable the learning of information in different scales in a hierarchical manner. The proposed framework is evaluated on both classification and segmentation datasets, demonstrating that the proposed method is capable of outperforming many state-of-the-art methods on both synthetic and LiDAR data. Our code has been released athttps://github.com/d62lu/3DGTN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207