MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395448601 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2024-0029

Provenance and depositional age of metasedimentary rocks in the Frontenac terrane (Grenville Province, Ontario)

2024· article· en· W4395448601 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
William H. Peck, Henry Y. Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersColgate University
KeywordsGeologyProvenanceTerraneSedimentary depositional environmentGeochemistryPlutonPetrologyPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mesoproterozoic Frontenac terrane in the southern Grenville Province of Ontario is separated by shear zones from the Composite Arc Belt to the west and the Adirondack Lowlands to the east. The majority of the terrane is made up of granulite-facies metasedimentary rocks that are the oldest lithologies recognized in the terrane. Five samples were selected for U–Pb geochronology to constrain (1) metamorphic age, (2) depositional age of sedimentary protoliths, and (3) source regions of detrital zircon. Two pelitic gneisses and a marble are dominated by metamorphic zircon, whereas two quartzites contain a diverse population of detrital zircon that are surrounded by metamorphic overgrowths. Metamorphic zircon have 206Pb/207Pb ages of 1.19–1.16 Ga, and a small population is 1.22 Ga. These ages correspond to the Shawinigan and Elzevirian orogenies and provide minimum ages for deposition. The youngest detrital grains with ages of 1.25–1.24 Ga provide maximum depositional ages. Quartzites (and pelitic gneisses) have a wide range of detrital zircon ages that reflect local Mesoproterozoic Grenville sources and Paleoproterzoic and Archean sources in the northern Grenville Province and elsewhere in Laurentia. Most notable is a large population of 1.9–1.8 Ga zircon, which points towards derivation from the Penokean orogen in the midcontinent or Makkovikian–Ketilidian orogen of Labrador and Greenland, indicating long sedimentary transport distances. The similarities in depositional ages and detrital zircon ages between Frontenac terrane and Adirondack metasedimentary rocks suggest a shared sedimentary history, which we interpret as deposition in the same Trans-Adirondack backarc basin at ca. 1.25 Ga.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207