MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395449658 · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47858-5

Planar thermal Hall effect from phonons in a Kitaev candidate material

2024· article· en· W4395449658 on OpenAlexafffund
Lu Chen, Étienne Lefrançois, Ashvini Vallipuram, Quentin Barthélemy, Amirreza Ataei, Weiliang Yao, Yuan Li, Louis Taillefer

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchInstitut quantiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaPeking UniversityCanada Foundation for InnovationNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada First Research Excellence FundCanada Research ChairsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPlanarPhononThermalHall effectMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsPhysicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The thermal Hall effect has emerged as a potential probe of exotic excitations in spin liquids. In the Kitaev magnet $${{\alpha }}$$ α -RuCl3, the thermal Hall conductivity $${{{\kappa }}}_{{{xy}}}$$ κ x y has been attributed to Majorana fermions, chiral magnons, or phonons. Theoretically, the former two types of heat carriers can generate a “planar” $${{{\kappa }}}_{{{xy}}}$$ κ x y , whereby the magnetic field is parallel to the heat current, but it is unknown whether phonons also could. Here we show that a planar $${{{\kappa }}}_{{{xy}}}$$ κ x y is present in another Kitaev candidate material, Na2Co2TeO6. Based on the striking similarity between $${{{\kappa }}}_{{{xy}}}$$ κ x y and the phonon-dominated thermal conductivity $${{{\kappa }}}_{{{xx}}}$$ κ x x , we attribute the effect to phonons. We observe a large difference in $${{{\kappa }}}_{{{xy}}}$$ κ x y between different configurations of heat current and magnetic field, which reveals that the direction of heat current matters in determining the planar $${{{\kappa }}}_{{{xy}}}$$ κ x y . Our observation calls for a re-evaluation of the planar $${{{\kappa }}}_{{{xy}}}$$ κ x y observed in $$\,{{\alpha }}$$ α -RuCl3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207