Predicting Transport Mode in the Rabat Region: A Machine Learning Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The continuous increase in population density and the increase in average travel of people by different modes of transportation, whether public or private, play a crucial part in how the city's urban area develops.The latter contribute significantly to the emergence of many problems, including road congestion, loss of time, and pollution in urban areas, noise, and other issues.Machine Learning has extensively beneficial aspects of proposing models in this context.Therefore, we proposed four algorithms of the machine learning techniques that have been implemented to analyze and classify the displacement of an individual's database to support urban decisions, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Artificial Neural Network-multilayer perceptron Neural (net-RBF), Bayesian Belief Network (BNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM).We will compare their learning metrics using train/test and cross-validation.The obtained results show that net-RBF offers the best accuracy (92.77%),SVM classifier (89.87%),BBN classifier (87.33%), and KNN classifier (86.53%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".