MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395462307 · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142298

Techno-eco-environmental assessment of dry fractionation of protein concentrates from yellow peas with different pre-treatment methods: An eco-efficiency approach

2024· article· en· W4395462307 on OpenAlexafffund
Derrick Kpakpo Allotey, Ebenezer Miezah Kwofie, Peter Adewale, Anusha Samaranayaka, Nandhakishore Rajagopalan, Praiya Asavajaru, Darrin Klassen, Michael Ngadi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cleaner Production · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsPlant Biotechnology InstituteMcGill University
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsFractionationEnvironmental scienceLife-cycle assessmentWaste managementChemistryEngineeringProduction (economics)ChromatographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For holistic and concise decision support, it is essential to assess the sustainability of pea protein production pathways from the technical, economic, and environmental perspectives. Although regarded as the most sustainable protein extraction process, sustainability assessment of different dry fractionation pathways has not yet been carried out. To address this limitation, this study carried out a comparative techno-eco-environmental assessment of three different dry fractionation scenarios, a baseline, and two pathways with upstream pre-treatment methods of Radio Frequency (RF) treatment and Infrared Radiation (IR) treatment. Process Separation Efficiency (PSE), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and Techno-economic Assessment (TEA) were performed. Findings from the study showed that the RF-treated and IR-treated pea seeds produce higher yields of protein concentrates with higher protein content, as compared to the baseline. However, the higher protein separation efficiency could not comparatively offset the capital costs, processing costs, and higher energy demand associated, causing it to be outperformed by the baseline, in the economic and environmental dimensions. Although the IR treatment pathway performed better than RF treatment environmentally, it performed the least at the economic criteria. Overall, performance levels carried out using economic and protein quality value improvement for eco-efficiency assessment showed that it is very salient to consider all these three criteria integratively when assessing the sustainability performance of protein extraction pathways to identify trade-offs amongst the different dimensions. Moreover, competitive advantage played a key role in the eco-efficiency performance levels. We therefore recommend that further studies to be conducted including the product techno-functionality for a broader and more holistic perspective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cleaner ProductionSame topicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactFrench-language works237,207