Determining Drivers of Chili Farming Participation: Insights from Upper Citarum Watershed, Indonesia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Considering its role on household consumption as well as production, in Indonesia chili is one of the most important vegetable commodities but also problematic in term of high risk and volatile price.Previous studies lack of detailed analyses on the factors influencing farmers' decisions to participate in chili farming and to expand their cultivation areas.Understanding farmer behavior is crucial for designing interventions that can effectively address the risks and challenges of chili farming.This study aimed to determine the behavior of farmers in chili farming.The research was conducted in one of the vegetable production centers in the Upper Citarum Watershed, West Java Province.Using the double-hurdle approach, the results show that the positive factors for the probability of participation are farmers' exposure to price volatility, the role of farming in the household economy, and positive attitudes towards vegetable farming as a way to increase income.For farmers who decided to participate, factors conducive to scaling up were self-financing, availability of family labor, and experience in vegetable farming.Results of this research imply that improvement of chili farming performance requires policy for increasing farmer access to market price, promoting contract farming, strenghtening coordination among farmers in utilising market price information for planning planting time and cropping pattern.The findings also contribute to the development of policies and practices that can improve the sustainability and profitability of chili farming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it