MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395464887 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.190205

Predicting Global Energy Consumption Through Data Mining Techniques

2024· article· en· W4395464887 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Atta Rahman, Hussam Khalid Abahussin, Ali Alkhwaja, Faisal Alfawaz, Ibrahim Alkhwaja, Mohammed Albugami, Mustafa Youldash, Tahir Iqbal, Aghiad Bakry, Hesham Abed Al-Musallam

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy consumptionConsumption (sociology)Environmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the explosion of the global population and technological progress, the electricity demand has skyrocketed.To ensure a consistent flow of power, it's essential to accurately predict energy usage ahead of time.Failure to do so could lead to potential outages and disrupt our daily lives.This research reviews previous research in the field of using data mining techniques to analyze electricity consumption data, optimize energy performance of buildings, and predict energy consumption in various industries.The study also aims to uncover patterns, correlations, and rules in electricity consumption worldwide using data mining techniques.The analysis is performed using various data mining techniques, such as simple K-Means and Expectation Maximization (EM).This selection is based on their prominent applications for similar problems in literature.The simple K-Means and EM algorithms showed successful outcomes on the dataset, which is evident in the clustering plots.Further, the performance of the Hierarchical Clustering algorithm was not up to the desired standard.This is probably due to the nature of the available dataset.These outcomes of the analysis will provide a valuable resource for decision-makers and stakeholders in the energy sector, as it will provide a deeper understanding of electricity consumption patterns and trends.This could lead to a sustainable future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207