Understanding Consumer Insights: Exploring Health Supplement Products Preferences in Malaysia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, health supplement consumption surged as people sought to safeguard their health.This study examines Malaysian consumer behavior toward health supplements, focusing on attitude, social influence, self-efficacy, price, and product quality.Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as a conceptual framework, data from 439 health supplement users were gathered via an online survey and analyzed using SPSS version 28, using a 5-point Likert scale.Pilot studies, expert validation, and reliability analysis ensured instrument validity.Findings show moderate consumption behavior of health supplement products among Malaysians, with necessity, self-efficacy, and product quality as significant influencers, notably with product quality having the most impact.This study offers insights into Malaysian consumer dynamics, guiding interventions for healthier lifestyles and consumer well-being.It contributes to understanding consumer behavior in health supplement consumption, with practical implications for stakeholders, policymakers, and marketers.Future research could explore factors like perceived value, trust, brand reputation, and product knowledge to deepen insights into consumer preferences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it