MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395465244 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.190203

Robust Near Infrared Spectroscopy for Rapid and Simultaneous Determination of Fermented Cocoa Pod Husk Feed Quality Attributes

2024· article· en· W4395465244 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Samadi Samadi, Indra Wahyudi, Sitti Wajizah, Zulfahrizal Zulfahrizal, Agus Arip Munawar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Syiah Kuala
KeywordsHuskPoint of deliveryNear-infrared spectroscopyFermentationQuality (philosophy)Agricultural engineeringMaterials sciencePulp and paper industryFood scienceProcess engineeringMathematicsEngineeringChemistryBiologyAgronomyBotanyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we attempted to develop a robust and accurate near infrared spectroscopic model for nutrient content analysis in fermented Cocoa Pod Husk (CPH), a viable but underexploited byproduct in cocoa production with great potential for use in animal feed.Recognizing the necessity for sustainable feed options, precise nutrient profiling of CPH is critical for balanced diets and effective feed formulation.To achieve this, specific spectral pre-processing techniques, namely multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), Savitzky-Golay smoothing (SGs), and the first derivative (1st D) were purposefully chosen for their individual and combined abilities to correct for scattering effects, smooth out noise, and enhance spectral resolution, respectively.These methods significantly contribute to the model's superior performance by improving the quality of the spectral data input.Furthermore, Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) was selected over other multivariate algorithms due to its robustness in handling collinear and noisy data, making it well-suited for complex biological matrices such as fermented CPH.Employing the Unscrambler X 10.4 software, the PLSR model was rigorously assessed using a range of statistical tools to ensure validity, with notable precision in predicting key nutritional components.The findings not only confirm the model's excellence but also hold promising implications for the agriculture industry, particularly in the development of cost-effective, nutrient-rich animal feed solutions.By capitalizing on the compositional richness of CPH and refining NIRS modeling for its analysis, this study contributes to the enhanced utilization of agricultural byproducts and the sustainability of animal nutrition practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisFrench-language works237,207