Skin Conductance Response Artifact Reduction: Leveraging Accelerometer Noise Reference and Deep Breath Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrodermal activity (EDA) shows a significant correlation with activation of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) activation. Regular ambulatory monitoring via wearables and consequent inference of ANS activation has a wide range of applications tracking mental health. The real-world implementation of a closed-loop system to regulate one’s emotional state to improve their mental well-being requires an accurate and reliable estimation of ANS activation in ambulatory settings. However, the presence of motion artifacts in skin conductance (SC) data collected in ambulatory settings makes the analysis for such estimation unreliable. We propose a multi-rate adaptive filtering scheme to reduce motion artifacts in SC data that utilizes three-axis accelerometer data. We investigate four types of linear and nonlinear adaptive filters. We use both simulated and experimental data to investigate the performance of adaptive filters. Furthermore, we utilize the respiration signal to identify the probability of respiration-induced SC artifacts. Next, we use a Bayesian filter-based deconvolution approach to identify SC responses (SCRs) induced by underlying arousal events and deep breaths. Finally, we propose to use the respiration signal to separate the artifacts in SC due to deep breaths. Our results show that linear finite impulse response least squares recursive filters perform best among the four types of adaptive filters studied. We draw this conclusion by obtaining receiver operating characteristics of event-related SCRs detection with deconvolution after artifact reduction with different adaptive filters. Moreover, for all of our simulated and experimental datasets investigated in this study, we observe that the recursive least-squares filter always provides stable results. Additionally, our results show our ability to detect respiration-induced SCRs and the corresponding activation of ANS. The evaluation of adaptive filters shows the potential to utilize reference signals for successful artifact modeling and reduction. Effective artifact reduction will lead to reliable ANS activation monitoring and consequent robust implementation of a closed-loop wearable machine interface architecture to eventually improve one’s mental health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".