Association of the sarcopenia index with cognitive impairment in a middle-aged to older patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: A multicenter cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The sarcopenia (SI) index, defined as the serum creatinine to cystatin C ratio, is considered a predictor of poor muscle health and malnutrition, which is related to major adverse cardiovascular events. However, the effect of the SI index on cognitive function in stroke patients remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to examine the association between the SI and longitudinal cognitive impairment in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants who met the inclusion criteria in this national, multicenter, prospective cohort study were enrolled from the Impairment of Cognition and Sleep (ICONS) study of the China National Stroke Registry-3 (CNSR-3). They were categorized into four groups according to the quartile of the SI index. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the association between the SI index and post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) at the 3-month follow-up. Moreover, discrimination tests were used to evaluate the incremental predictive value of the SI index beyond the potential risk factors. Furthermore, we performed subgroup analyses to test interactions. RESULTS: Among the enrolled participants, the lower the SI index was, the worse the cognitive performance. At the 3-month follow-up, participants in the lowest SI quartile group exhibited a 42% increase in the risk of cognitive impairment relative to the highest quartile group [OR 0.58 (95% CI 0.37-0.90)]. Moreover, after applying the discrimination test, adding the SI index into the potential risk factors resulted in a slight improvement in predicting the risk of cognitive impairment [NRI 14% (P = 0.01)]. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that a lower sarcopenia index was positively associated with a higher prevalence of PSCI. Monitoring the SI index in stroke patients and early identification and treatment of individuals with low SI level may be helpful to reduce the risk of cognitive impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".