Enhancing Crop Mapping through Automated Sample Generation Based on Segment Anything Model with Medium-Resolution Satellite Imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crop mapping using satellite imagery is crucial for agriculture applications. However, a fundamental challenge that hinders crop mapping progress is the scarcity of samples. The latest foundation model, Segment Anything Model (SAM), provides an opportunity to address this issue, yet few studies have been conducted in this area. This study investigated the parcel segmentation performance of SAM on commonly used medium-resolution satellite imagery (i.e., Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8) and proposed a novel automated sample generation framework based on SAM. The framework comprises three steps. First, an image optimization automatically selects high-quality images as the inputs for SAM. Then, potential samples are generated based on the masks produced by SAM. Finally, the potential samples are subsequently subjected to a sample cleaning procedure to acquire the most reliable samples. Experiments were conducted in Henan Province, China, and southern Ontario, Canada, using six proven effective classifiers. The effectiveness of our method is demonstrated through the combination of field-survey-collected samples and differently proportioned generated samples. Our results indicated that directly using SAM for parcel segmentation remains challenging, unless the parcels are large, regular in shape, and have distinct color differences from surroundings. Additionally, the proposed approach significantly improved the performance of classifiers and alleviated the sample scarcity problem. Compared to classifiers trained only by field-survey-collected samples, our method resulted in an average improvement of 16% and 78.5% in Henan and Ontario, respectively. The random forest achieved relatively good performance, with weighted-average F1 of 0.97 and 0.996 obtained using Sentinel-2 imagery in the two study areas, respectively. Our study contributes insights into solutions for sample scarcity in crop mapping and highlights the promising application of foundation models like SAM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".