MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395478716 · doi:10.1364/oe.518479

Fourier space aberration correction for high resolution refractive index imaging using incoherent light

2024· article· en· W4395478716 on OpenAlexaff
Yoonjae Chung, Hervé Hugonnet, Seung‐Mo Hong, YongKeun Park

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDigital Holography and Microscopy
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
FundersInstitute for Information and Communications Technology PromotionNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsOpticsDeconvolutionPoint spread functionRefractive indexFourier transformSpherical aberrationSpatial frequencyMicroscopyPhase retrievalContrast transfer functionOptical aberrationComputer sciencePhysicsWavefrontLens (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An aberration correction method is introduced for 3D phase deconvolution microscopy. Our technique capitalizes on multiple illumination patterns to iteratively extract Fourier space aberrations, utilizing the overlapping information inherent in these patterns. By refining the point spread function based on the retrieved aberration data, we significantly improve the precision of refractive index deconvolution. We validate the effectiveness of our method on both synthetic and biological three-dimensional samples, achieving notable enhancements in resolution and measurement accuracy. The method's reliability in aberration retrieval is further confirmed through controlled experiments with intentionally induced spherical aberrations, underscoring its potential for wide-ranging applications in microscopy and biomedicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicDigital Holography and MicroscopyFrench-language works237,207