Bibliographic record
Abstract
A dataset containing 2708 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "and" : [ "Continent is North America", "Country is Canada", "HasCoordinate is true", "HasGeospatialIssue is false", "OccurrenceStatus is Present", { "or" : [ "TaxonKey is Riparia riparia (Linnaeus, 1758)", "TaxonKey is Hirundo rustica Linnaeus, 1758", "TaxonKey is Dolichonyx oryzivorus (Linnaeus, 1758)", "TaxonKey is Calidris subruficollis (Vieillot, 1819)", "TaxonKey is Athene cunicularia (Molina, 1782)", "TaxonKey is Cardellina canadensis (Linnaeus, 1766)", "TaxonKey is Calcarius ornatus (J.K.Townsend, 1837)", "TaxonKey is Chaetura pelagica (Linnaeus, 1758)", "TaxonKey is Chordeiles minor (J.R.Forster, 1771)", "TaxonKey is Antrostomus vociferus (A.Wilson, 1812)", "TaxonKey is Contopus virens (Linnaeus, 1766)", "TaxonKey is Coccothraustes vespertinus (W.Cooper, 1825)", "TaxonKey is Buteo regalis (G.R.Gray, 1844)", "TaxonKey is Vermivora chrysoptera (Linnaeus, 1766)", "TaxonKey is Zonotrichia querula (Nuttall, 1840)", "TaxonKey is Podiceps auritus (Linnaeus, 1758)", "TaxonKey is Limosa haemastica (Linnaeus, 1758)", "TaxonKey is Calamospiza melanocorys Stejneger, 1885", "TaxonKey is Ixobrychus exilis (Gmelin, 1789)", "TaxonKey is Lanius ludovicianus excubitorides (Swainson, 1832)", "TaxonKey is Contopus cooperi (Nuttall, 1831)", "TaxonKey is Falco peregrinus Tunstall, 1771", "TaxonKey is Melanerpes erythrocephalus (Linnaeus, 1758)", "TaxonKey is Phalaropus lobatus (Linnaeus, 1758)", "TaxonKey is Euphagus carolinus (Statius Muller, 1776)", "TaxonKey is Asio flammeus (Pontoppidan, 1763)", "TaxonKey is Anthus spragueii (Audubon, 1844)", "TaxonKey is Cygnus buccinator Richardson, 1831", "TaxonKey is Aechmophorus occidentalis (Lawrence, 1858)", "TaxonKey is Grus americana (Linnaeus, 1758)", "TaxonKey is Coturnicops noveboracensis (Gmelin, 1789)", "TaxonKey is Ammodramus bairdii (Audubon, 1844)" ] }, "Year is greater than or equal to 2000" ] } The dataset includes 2708 records from 9 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0143001-200613084148143/datasets/export for details. Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.266 | 0.398 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".