Multi-scale 3D-CRU for EEG emotion recognition*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we propose a novel multi-scale 3D-CRU model, with the goal of extracting more discriminative emotion feature from EEG signals. By concurrently exploiting the relative electrode locations and different frequency subbands of EEG signals, a three-dimensional feature representation is reconstructed wherein the Delta ( δ ) frequency pattern is included. We employ a multi-scale approach, termed 3D-CRU, to concurrently extract frequency and spatial features at varying levels of granularity within each time segment. In the proposed 3D-CRU, we introduce a multi-scale 3D Convolutional Neural Network (3D-CNN) to effectively capture discriminative information embedded within the 3D feature representation. To model the temporal dynamics across consecutive time segments, we incorporate a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) module to extract temporal representations from the time series of combined frequency-spatial features. Ultimately, the 3D-CRU model yields a global feature representation, encompassing comprehensive information across time, frequency, and spatial domains. Numerous experimental assessments conducted on publicly available DEAP and SEED databases provide empirical evidence supporting the enhanced performance of our proposed model in the domain of emotion recognition. These findings underscore the efficacy of the features extracted by the proposed multi-scale 3D-GRU model, particularly with the incorporation of the Delta ( δ ) frequency pattern. Specifically, on the DEAP dataset, the accuracy of Valence and Arousal are 93.12% and 94.31%, respectively, while on the SEED dataset, the accuracy is 92.25%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".