MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395660503 · doi:10.46254/ba06.20230105

Computer Vision Based Automated Attendance System Using Face Recognition

2023· article· en· W4395660503 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacial recognition systemComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceFace (sociological concept)Face detectionAttendancePattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Face recognition technology has gained substantial attention owing to its diverse applications. One of the applications include face recognition-based attendance system which stands out the most among all the existing attendance systems because of its heightened security and time-saving capabilities. Face recognition system is the process of recognizing an individual based only on their facial traits. This paper proposes a real-time face recognition attendance system which validates the real-time monitoring of the process. OpenCV has been used to create a Haar cascade classifier, which is used to recognize faces. The face recognition algorithm Local Binary Pattern Histogram (LBPH) has been chosen in this system due to its robustness and better applicability in the real world. This proposed method is capable of identifying faces of individuals effectively from various angles. The results prove the validation of the work through the monitoring of students' attendance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207