MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395665331 · doi:10.34067/kid.0000000000000448

Tubular Injury Biomarkers to Predict CKD and Hypertension at 3 Months Post-Cisplatin in Children

2024· letter· en· W4395665331 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryan S. Huang, Kelly R. McMahon, Stella Wang, Hayton Chui, Asaf Lebel, Jasmine Lee, Vedran Cockovski, Shahrad R. Rassekh, Kirk R. Schultz, Tom Blydt‐Hansen, Geoff D.E. Cuvelier, Cherry Mammen, Maury Pinsk, Bruce Carleton, Ross T. Tsuyuki, Colin J.D. Ross, Ana Palijan, Michael Zappitelli

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney360 · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of ManitobaCancerCare ManitobaQueen's UniversityMcGill University Health CentreBC Children's HospitalUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick Children
FundersGarron Family Cancer CentreSickkids Research InstituteHospital for Sick ChildrenC17 CouncilMichael Smith Health Research BCPediatric Oncology Group of OntarioCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill University Health Centre
KeywordsMedicineKidney diseaseCreatinineAcute kidney injuryInternal medicineBiomarkerLipocalinNephrotoxicityCisplatinRenal functionUrologyAdverse effectGastroenterologyKidneyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Points Tubular injury biomarkers are not individually strong predictors of 3-month post-cisplatin CKD. When combined with clinical measures, tubular injury biomarkers can predict post-therapy hypertension and identify high-risk patients. Background Urine kidney injury biomarkers measured during cisplatin therapy may identify patients at risk of adverse subsequent kidney outcomes. We examined relationships between tubular injury biomarkers collected early (early visit [EV]: first or s econd cisplatin cycle) and late (late visit: last or second-last cisplatin cycle) during cisplatin therapy, with 3-month post-cisplatin CKD and hypertension (HTN). Methods We analyzed data from the Applying Biomarkers to Minimize Long-Term Effects of Childhood/Adolescent Cancer Treatment Nephrotoxicity study, a 12-center prospective cohort study of 159 children receiving cisplatin. We measured urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL)/creatinine, kidney injury molecule-1/creatinine, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2), and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP-7) (TIMP-2 and IGFBP-7 expressed as their product, ng/ml 2 /1000) at an EV and late visit during cisplatin therapy with preinfusion, postinfusion, and hospital discharge sampling. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for biomarkers to detect 3-month post-cisplatin CKD (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines: low eGFR or elevated urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio for age) and HTN (three BPs; per American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines). Results At median follow-up of 90 days, 52 of 118 patients (44%) and 17 of 125 patients (14%) developed CKD and HTN, respectively. Biomarker prediction for 3-month CKD was low to modest; NGAL combined with kidney injury molecule-1 at EV discharge yielded the highest AUC (0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.77). Biomarker prediction of 3-month HTN was stronger, but modest; the highest AUC was from combining EV preinfusion NGAL and TIMP-2×IGFBP-7 (0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.62 to 0.80). When EV preinfusion NGAL and TIMP-2×IGFBP-7 were added to the 3-month HTN clinical predictive model, AUCs increased from 0.81 (0.72 to 0.91) to 0.89 (0.83 to 0.95) ( P < 0.05). Conclusions Tubular injury biomarkers we studied were individually not strong predictors of 3-month post-cisplatin kidney outcomes. Adding biomarkers to existing clinical prediction models may help predict post-therapy HTN and identify higher kidney-risk patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney360Same topicChemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigationFrench-language works237,207