Space‐use strategies drive diet composition of Baffin Bay polar bears
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Polar bears ( Ursus maritimus ) depend on sea ice to hunt their ice‐associated prey. However, climate‐induced sea ice loss is leading to changes in space‐use strategies of polar bears, with bears in some subpopulations spending more time on land or selecting alternative habitats. One such documented alternative habitat is glacier ice, which provides year‐round access to prey, although the feeding habits of polar bears using glacier ice relative to those following the retreating ice and/or seasonally moving onshore are not known. Here, we use adipose tissue from polar bears ( n = 104) from the Baffin Bay subpopulation live‐captured in Northwest Greenland during the springs of 2009–2013 to investigate dietary patterns between space‐use strategies inferred from satellite telemetry data, while considering demographic and interannual variation. Using quantitative fatty acid signature analysis (QFASA) to generate diet estimates, ringed seals ( Pusa hispida ) and bearded seals ( Erignathus barbatus ) were estimated as the primary and secondary prey of Baffin Bay polar bears for all sex/age classes and sampling years, apart from a single anomalous year (2009) with a relatively high proportion of beluga ( Delphinapterus leucas ) and narwhal ( Monodon monoceros ). While demographic and short‐term temporal variation was minimal, fatty acid signatures and QFASA‐generated diet estimates clearly differed between polar bears using coastal and offshore space‐use strategies. “Offshore” adult females ( n = 31), which make long‐distance movements across the Baffin Bay pack ice, had high proportions of C22‐chain length monosaturated fatty acids and diet estimates that included beluga, narwhal, harp ( Pagophilus groenlandicus ), and hooded seal ( Cystophora cristata ). “Coastal” adult females ( n = 6), which remain resident at glacier fronts in Northwest Greenland year‐round including during the sea ice‐free season, consumed proportionally more ringed seals (+13%) and similar proportions of bearded seal, but essentially no beluga and narwhal or harp and hooded seal. Thus, space‐use strategy is a driver of intrapopulation diet variability. As space‐use strategies change with ongoing loss of sea ice habitat, our results suggest important ramifications for polar bear feeding patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".