MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Water Quality Assessment of AL-Mahawil Stream/Babylon/Iraq Using Canadian Water Quality Index

2024· article· en· W4395670691 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
May Hameed Mohammad AL-Dehamee

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Pollution Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)Water qualityEnvironmental scienceQuality (philosophy)Water resource managementHydrology (agriculture)GeographyGeologyComputer scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study aimed to know the water quality in Al-Mahawil stream which is a stream from Euphrates River in Babylon governorate by using Canadian water quality index by determining the values of the most important physical and chemical parameters in water stream after taken three study sites along the stream [site 1 (S1), site 2 (S2), site 3 (S3)]. the data was determined seasonally after collection the samples monthly from December 2021 to November 2022. The results first finding out whether the values of these parameters within or above of Iraqi limiting standards of drinking water after that the Canadian water quality index (WQI) has been calculation, then determined if water stream can possibly directly used for drinking purpose or other uses. Generally, results pointed that some of physical and chemicals parameters were in Iraqi permissible limiting of drinking water, while others parameters were above Iraqi limiting standard. Also, the results showed that WQI for Al-Mahawil stream after used all study parameters for calculating was marginal and cannot used directly for drinking purpose. Also, results showed there was a significant differentiation among some parameters with positive correlation coefficients among it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentFrench-language works237,207