Electrochemical insight into the passivity and corrosion of 316 L stainless steel fabricated through wire arc additive manufacturing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the microstructure of AISI 316 L stainless steel fabricated by wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) and establishes correlations with its passivity and corrosion characteristics in a 0.9 wt.% NaCl solution, while making comparisons with the wrought alloy counterpart. The WAAM-fabricated alloy demonstrates a favorable chemical composition in comparison to the wrought alloy, exhibiting a heterogeneous microstructure comprised of residual delta ferrite within the austenitic matrix. The pitting vulnerability of the WAAM-printed alloy is observed to be lower than that of the wrought counterpart, a phenomenon further investigated through passive film behavior analysis. Mott-Schottky analysis and the point defect model (PDM) revealed the development of a less defective passive layer on the WAAM-fabricated alloy, enhancing overall passivity and electrochemical response, attributed to the interplay between microstructural features and chemical composition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".