The Role of Safety and Security in Achieving Urban Space Vitality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vitality is a sustainable concept that enhances survival and life, distinguishes successful cities from their counterparts, accommodates various events, and generates an active public life.The research highlights the role of safety and security in achieving the vitality of urban space.Therefore, the research problem was the lack of clarity of the safety and security factors and indicators that enable us to create a vibrant and sustainable urban space.Accordingly, the aim of the research in the conceptual framework was to identify these factors and indicators and explain their role in achieving vital space.This was achieved by following the descriptive approach as well as analyzing the data of the study area (Al-Mutanabbi neighborhood space in the city of Kufa, Iraq) using geographical information systems.The research assumed that there are five factors related to safety and security that greatly influence the vitality of urban space.These factors are as follows (traffic safety, protection from crime, control of public space, density, and accessibility).These factors affect people's use of urban space and the duration of residence there.It controls the density of users, as well as providing the opportunity to practice various community activities and enjoy public life within the space.It was concluded that the vitality of urban space cannot be created unless indicators of traffic safety and accessibility within this space are activated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".