MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395680568 · doi:10.5670/oceanog.2024.231

Sharing and Adapting the Homeowner’s Handbook to Prepare for Natural Hazards

2024· article· en· W4395680568 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dennis J. Hwang, Kanesa Duncan Seraphin, Darren K. Okimoto, Cindy Knapman

Bibliographic record

VenueOceanography · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisaster Management and Resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStrongHawai'i Sea Grant, University of Hawai'iCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
KeywordsOutreachPublic relationsWork (physics)Natural hazardNatural disasterCommunity educationHazardBusinessNatural resourcePolitical scienceEngineeringSociologyGeographyPedagogyMeteorologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2007, the University of Hawai‘i Sea Grant College Program produced the Homeowner’s Handbook to Prepare for Natural Hazards in response to the significant threat of hurricanes and a sense of the urgent need to help communities prepare. There are now 15 versions of the Handbook across the Sea Grant network, with over 189,250 copies printed in three languages. The Handbook helps prepare communities for natural hazard risk with best practices that are resilient, adaptive, and sustainable. Partnerships between scientific organizations, emergency managers, the private sector, and community groups have played key roles in developing, distributing, updating, and educating the public. A wide range of education activities—from adult outreach through seminars, webinars, emergency fairs, workshops, and continuing education courses to student and K–12 teaching resources to TV and media sharing—​were developed for greater reach into the community. Going forward, programs have plans to include more information on climate change, to address not just homeowners but all residents, to encourage helping the vulnerable, and to work with emergency managers and partners to expand the range of education and outreach so that the “Whole Community” can be reached.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOceanographySame topicDisaster Management and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207