MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395680945 · doi:10.46254/ba06.20230199

Aggregate Planning, MPS, And MRP Of A Textile Production

2023· article· en· W4395680945 on OpenAlexaff
Abdullah Al Rahi, Musabbir Hasan Sumon, Ebrahim Pichka, Qausar Rhaman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTextileAggregate (composite)Production (economics)Aggregate planningMaterial requirements planningBusinessProduction planningManufacturing engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringEconomicsMaterials scienceMicroeconomicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The textile industry in Bangladesh, constituting the major share of the GDP, is mostly dependent on the strength of experience and cheap labor rate. But it is facing challenges in small-scale production due to outdated technology and high operating costs. This particular sector, renowned for its global textile manufacturing role, particularly in ready-made garments, fabric manufacturing can benefit from aggregate planning. By aligning production with demand, optimizing resource utilization, and managing inventory effectively, following this strategy small textile companies can overcome operational shortcomings. To conduct the analysis process, the actual data utilized for examination encompassed a total of 517 product requirement. ABC analysis was done based on four months' requirements to identify products that generate the majority of sales. This strategic approach led to the selection of 12 products, collectively contributing to 60% of the total requirements. MRP focuses on a select 12 products. While these products vary, the raw materials exhibit less diversity, with six types common to all. These raw materials are procured either locally or internationally. This study aims to explore the inclusion of aggregate planning in the textile industries of Bangladesh, evaluating its potential to significantly reduce costs and enhance overall production and material resource planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics OptimizationFrench-language works237,207