MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395684896 · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2024.103862

Semantic segmentation of large-scale point cloud scenes via dual neighborhood feature and global spatial-aware

2024· article· en· W4395684896 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tao Liu, Tianen Ma, Du Ping, Dehui Li

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint cloudComputer scienceSegmentationArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Spatial analysisComputer visionGeographyRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a core task in 3D scene information extraction, point cloud semantic segmentation is crucial for understanding 3D scenes and environmental perception. While extracting local geometric structural features from point clouds, existing research often overlooks the long-range dependencies present in the scene, making it challenging to fully uncover the long-range contextual features hidden within point clouds. On this basis, we propose a segmentation algorithm (DG-Net) that integrates dual neighborhood features with global spatial-aware. Initially, the local structure information encoding module is designed to learn about local geometric shapes by encoding spatial position and directional features, thus supplementing structural information. Subsequently, a dual neighborhood features complementary module is introduced to merge the geometric structural and semantic features within local neighborhoods, learning local dependencies and capturing distinguishable local contextual features. Finally, these features are relayed to a global spatial-aware module equipped with a gated unit, which dynamically adjusts the weights of features at different stages, effectively modeling long-range dependencies between local structures and finely extracting long-range contextual features. We conducted experiments on benchmark datasets of point cloud scenes, and both quantitative and qualitative results demonstrate that our algorithm can accurately identify small-scale objects with complex geometric structures within scenes, surpassing other mainstream networks in segmentation performance. The mIoU on the S3DIS, Toronto3D, and SensatUrban datasets are 71.9 %, 82.1 %, and 59.8 %, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207