Study on the crashworthiness of multi-cell thin-walled tubes filled with triply periodic minimal surface lattices
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To improve energy absorption and efficiency and develop a structure with outstanding energy absorption capability, this study proposed designing multi-cell tubes filled with triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) lattices. Based on experimental and simulation methods, the crashworthiness of multi-cell tubes filled with three types of TPMS lattices (Diamond, Gyroid, and Primitive) was investigated. Five multi-cell tube structures were fabricated by increasing the thin-walled tube corner units, improving the energy absorption efficiency by 67.98%. The results show that due to the coupling between TPMS lattices and thin-walled tubes, multi-cell tubes filled with TPMS lattices exhibited better crashworthiness performance. The energy absorption of multi-cell tubes filled with Diamond, Gyroid, and Primitive lattices increased sequentially. The energy absorption per unit mass and energy absorption capability were most notably enhanced for the multi-cell tubes filled with Diamond lattice, with energy absorption efficiency 17.24% higher and energy absorption 104.26% greater than empty multi-cell tubes. This inspires crash designs of rail vehicles and automotive fronts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it