Multiscale Space-Time Analysis of Environmental Changes in the Oil Sands Area (Alberta, Canada)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our study encompasses the Oil Sands Area (OSA) within northern Alberta, Canada, which has experienced substantial environmental changes over the last decades, in association with natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Using composites of Landsat imagery for 5-year intervals between 2000 and 2020, we performed two parallel geospatial analyses to assess environmental changes, examining landscape metrics and spectral indices. Landscape metrics were calculated from land use/land cover maps derived from a Random Forest supervised classification. Spectral indices included Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Normalised Difference Built-up Index (NDBI), among others. Both hierarchical zonal analysis of spectral indices and zonal landscape metrics were calculated based upon two different aggregations of nested drainage basin features from hydrologic unit code (HUC - Watersheds of Alberta). Spatial contiguity of changes was evaluated by hotspot analysis. HUCs determined to experience significant changes at coarse aggregation level were examined at finer level. The combination of landscape metrics and zonal analysis provided evidence of substantial, yet localized, areas of changing trends. Mixed forest experienced the most significant changes; urban/barren areas initially increased and later decreased, indicating change both in agricultural and human-made areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it